Talk:Keres Defence

(Rated Start-class, Low-importance)

	Chess portal v t e This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chess, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Chess on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

3. Nf3 and Bb2 (listed as responses in article) do not appear to be legal responses. Bd2, Nc3, and Nd2 seem possible. --Tabor 22:01, 6 May 2005 (UTC)

Corrected. Sjakkalle 08:56, 7 May 2005 (UTC)

Qd2[edit]

No offense, but "Qd2" doesn't just "seem to be dubious", it's just plain bad, losing a queen for a bishop at no compensation. (unsigned)

It is so obvious to even a beginner that I think it could be taken out. Bubba73 (talk), 05:19, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

Well, I took out most of that line. Bubba73 (talk), 05:20, 7 October 2006 (UTC)